NeuroOptometric Evaluation and Rehabilitation
Low Vision Evaluation and Treatment
Padula Institute News Releases
Vision Resources:
- Learn to See Program
- for Patients
- for Educators
- for Clinicians
- for the Elderly
- for learning disabilities
- large print website
- other language versions available
How vision relates to Learning Disabilities
| PADULA INSTITUTE OF VISION |
|
Visual evoked potentials (VEP) evaluating treatment for post-trauma vision syndrome (PTVS) in patients with traumatic brain injuries (TBI)
Brain Injury, 1994, VOL. 8, NO. 2. 125-133 |
|
 |
W. V. PADULA, S. ARGYRIS and J. RAY Click here to read the Visual evoked potentials (VEP) evaluating treatment for post-trauma vision syndrome (PTVS) in patients with traumatic brain injuries (TBI) paper. |
|
|
|
References: |
||
|
|
||
|
|
1. GIANUTSOs, R., RAMSEY, G. and PERLIN, R.: Rehabilitative optometric services for survivors of acquired brain injury.
Journal of the American Optometric Association, 69: 573-578. 2. CINOTTI, A. S.: Diplopia in the aged: etiology and management. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 28: 84-87, 1980. 3. SODEN, R. and COHEN, A. H.: An optometric approach to the treatment of a non-coryu'tant deviation. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 54: 451-454, 1983. 4. HART, C.: Disturbances of fusion following head injury. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 62: 1964. 6. CARROLL, R.: Acute loss of fusional convergence following head trauma. Archives of Ophthalmology, 88: 57-59, 1984. 7. RUTKOWSKI, P. C. and BUREAU, H. M.: Divergence paralysis following head trauma. Journal of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, 73: 660-662, 1982. 8. WICK, R. E.: Temporary vertical prisms following a concussion. Journal of the American Academy of Optometry, 59: 475-480, 1968. 9. STANWORTH, A.: Defects of ocular movement and fusion after head injury. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 58: 266-271, 1974. 10. HALLIDAY, A. M., McDONALD, W. 1. and MUSHIN, J.: Delayed pattern evoked responses in optic neuritis in relationship to visual acuity. Transactions of the Ophthalmological Society, 93: 315, 1973. 11. REGAN, D.: Speedy assessment of visual acuity in amblyopia by evoked potential method. Ophthalmologia, 175: 159, 1977. 12. Rizzo, P., PIEPELLI, F., POZZESSERE, G. et al.: Subjective post traumatic syndrome. Neuropsychobiology, 9: 78-82, 1983. 13. FIRSCHING, R. and FROWEIN, R.: Multimodity evoked potentials and early prognosis in comatose patients. Neurosurgery Review, 13: 141-146, 1990. 14. TPEVARTHEN, C. B. and SPERRY, R.: Perceptual unity of the ambient visual field in human commissurotomy patients. Brain, 96: 547-570, 1973. 15. LIEBOWITZ, H. W. and POST, R. B.: The two modes of processing concept and some implications. In J. J. Beck (Ed.) Organization and Representation in Perception (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) (In press). 16. NASHOLD, B. and SEABER, J.: Defects of ocular mobility after stereotactic midbrain lesions in man. Archives of Ophthalmology, 88: 245-248, 1972. 17. PADULA, W. V.: A Behavioral Vision Approach for Persons with Physical Disabilities (Optometric Extension Publishers), 1988. 18. STREFF, J.: The use of bi-nasal occluder treatment for patients with head trauma. Neuro-Optometric Rehabilitation Association Newsletter, 2: 1, 1992. Return to top Click here to read the Visual evoked potentials (VEP) evaluating treatment for post-trauma vision syndrome (PTVS) in patients with traumatic brain injuries (TBI) paper |
|
|
|
||